Understanding Video Verification Security Services
Video verification security services enhance traditional alarm systems by combining live or recorded surveillance footage with real-time human or AI analysis. When a sensor is triggered—whether by motion, a door opening, or another activity—the system immediately pairs the alert with corresponding video footage. This footage is then reviewed to determine whether the alarm represents a genuine security threat or a false alarm, such as an animal, weather disturbance, or human error.
This rapid verification process enables quicker and more accurate responses from security personnel or emergency services, significantly reducing unnecessary callouts and improving overall safety. Whether it’s a commercial property, residential home, or industrial site, video verification offers a smarter, more reliable approach to modern security.
How Video Verification Security Services Work
Alarm Triggered
A sensor (e.g., motion detector, door contact, glass break) triggers an alarm..
Video Footage Captured
Surveillance cameras automatically record and transmit video clips from the moment the alarm goes off—often capturing a few seconds before and after the trigger.
Verification Process
Matrix Security’s Monitoring Centre: A trained security operator at our monitoring centre reviews the footage in real time to determine if there’s a genuine threat (like a break-in) or a false alarm (like a pet or wind-blown object).
AI Assistance: In many systems, AI analyses the footage first to identify potential threats—like human presence or unusual motion—flagging them for human review if needed.
Appropriate Response Initiated
If a real threat is confirmed:
Authorities are contacted immediately (police, fire, etc.).
Matrix Security can contact the property owner. If it’s a false alarm, the alert is dismissed—avoiding unnecessary emergency response.
Benefits of Video Verification Services
Faster
Response
Fewer False
Alarms
Increased Security Accuracy
Cost
Savings
Enhanced Situational
Awareness
Insurance
Perks
Remote Monitoring
& Control
Comparison with Traditional Monitoring
Traditional Security Monitoring typically involves a set of sensors (motion detectors, window contacts, etc.) that alert our monitoring centre when an event occurs, such as a break-in, glass breaking, or a fire alarm. Here’s how it compares:
Alarm Verification
- Traditional Monitoring: Our monitoring centre receives the alarm notification but has no direct way of knowing whether the alarm is real (e.g., caused by a burglar) or false (e.g., triggered by a pet or wind).
- Video Verification: Cameras provide live footage or recorded clips to confirm the nature of the alarm. This allows our operator to verify if the alarm is genuine before taking action, saving time and reducing false responses.
Response Time
- Traditional Monitoring: Police or emergency responders may be dispatched based solely on the alarm signal, leading to delays if the alarm is a false one.
- Video Verification: Verification allows for immediate clarification. If the situation is a confirmed threat, responders can be alerted right away, often prioritising the response.
False Alarm
- Traditional Monitoring: False alarms can be more frequent and often result in unnecessary callouts for the property owner, as well as reduced confidence in the system’s effectiveness.
- Video Verification: By using real-time video, false alarms can be dramatically reduced, as our monitoring centre can see and verify what’s actually happening.
Cost
- Traditional Monitoring: While traditional monitoring is generally less expensive in the short term, repeated false alarms can add up. Additionally, traditional monitoring often requires expensive equipment installations.
- Video Verification: Video systems tend to be more expensive initially (due to cameras and smart tech), but the long-term savings on patrol callouts, improved response times, and reduced false alarm rates can outweigh the upfront costs.
Security Accuracy
- Traditional Monitoring: Without visual confirmation, operators might have to rely on alarms alone to assess a threat. This increases the chance of misidentifying a threat or missing key details.
- Video Verification: The ability to visually assess a situation before responding provides a higher level of accuracy and ensures that the response is appropriate.
Insurance Benefits
- Traditional Monitoring: Insurance premiums can be reduced with traditional alarm monitoring, but not as significantly as with video verification systems.
- Video Verification: Because verified video alarms reduce false calls to emergency services and provide clearer security evidence, some insurers offer greater discounts on premiums
Summary
Video Verification significantly enhances security by combining real-time video footage with alarm signals, offering superior accuracy, faster response times, and a substantial reduction in false alarms. This advanced system enables monitoring professionals or emergency responders to visually confirm threats before taking action, making it a powerful solution for those who prioritise proactive, high-level protection.
Traditional Alarm Monitoring, while more basic, remains a viable and budget-friendly option—particularly in environments where false alarms are uncommon and visual verification isn’t a priority. It still provides a layer of security and peace of mind for many users, especially in low-risk settings.
Both systems serve valuable purposes. The right choice depends on your property’s risk level, the importance of visual confirmation, and your available budget. Whether you’re looking for cutting-edge security or a simpler, cost-effective solution, there’s a monitoring system to suit your needs.
New Contact Us Form
Latest contact form - changes made were to remove outdated fields & compulsory fields